Anthropology is one of the several areas I have
so much curiosity and interest to learn and delve about. And the nice thing
about this one is that it is distant enough from my current studies so that I
will have new ideas, but at the same time, it has enough connections that it
will open my horizons wider.
One of these anthropological ideas I’ve been
thinking very roughly about is the way human cultures are so, so deeply
influenced by the nature all around us. Earlier cultures had people literally
connecting themselves to plants and animals. The simpler example is the native
Americans using feathers to their outfit so to represent themselves as somehow
related to the nature around them. But I don’t think it has disappeared even in
our world.
All objects we develop have their shapes
influenced by some element already present in our lives. It can be so subtle
that it can be present in everything, from shapes of cars (VW beetles, as a
clear example). Some car hoods I see seem to have some influence in the snouts
of some animals, and even the front layout with the lights seem to emulate a
creature. Do cars have two lights because in nature it so happens that virtually
all eyed life forms have two eyes?
But the molds and symmetric lines of evolution
that makes some animals and insects look so visually engaging also happen to
influence us. It’s about how human mind follows natural patterns. It’s all
around us, so those cultures more connected to nature make the individuals see
themselves as part of it. Humans long to be delicate and beautiful like flowers
or dashing and strong like lions. We long for being as imposing as imposing as
mountains, or quiet like a gentle breeze licking the trees in the forest.
Indeed, we seem to get involved with these allegorical quintessences. No wonder
we refer to chaotic periods in our lives as storms and the peace afterwards as
the clouds torn open to let the blue sky in - the caring mother coming to sooth
her child.
But here’s one old question of mine… when is
something a result of crests or just influence of sensors? I never got to
actually think too much about it, as I can’t possibly get past this primordial
question. I’d like to think of sensors existing prior to crests, but I don’t
want to go ahead of the quintessential rope guiding me.
No comments:
Post a Comment