There is a style I am trying to develop in
here, and I do it through leitmotifing, chaining and networking. However, I
call them individually and the lack of a sense of group makes this style be
feebly anchored in my mind. No, even if networking is almost like the main idea
I have about the group, it still means mostly one aspect of the whole thing. I
need some other name for me to work on it.
I will call it Needlework. It is catchy name
and is a nice expression about how I feel when trying to insert connections
among these texts. It’s what I think gives my texts a distinct characteristic,
and I see a lot of potential in trying to develop this style the more I can. I
expect to develop it to an excelsior state, and as time passes and I have more
resources in these hundreds of texts written, it will be easier to connect them.
There are millions of things to be referenced.
But it’s not only a style, but also a way to
keep everything intact. In fact, as the number of texts grow, it’s getting
easier to forget the actual reference, even if in my mind I know it’s been
dissected or exposed already. So as I try to have previous texts in mind so I
can make a reference to them, and having clear names anchored along with the
quintessential memory. This way I feel slightly more protected against
returning quintessences and having too many different names telling the same
thing will always make me lose control way too easily.
One of my concerns about the needlework is
about the readers. I think of how they react to my texts, though it’s mostly
speculation. My purpose when doing this needlework is to give the reader the
feeling of seeing how everything is so deeply intertwined. I hope it could
create that giggle of the mind when I am listening to a soundtrack and a known
theme is suddenly recognized. I hope reading texts featuring this style feel as
nice to see these connections as much as it is nice for me when I perceive them
and write these references. One of the points I need to state clear in here is
how I need to focus in making reference more about the titles, as they are more
likely the readers will remember. So the titles have to be the head of the
needle, so even if they have read mostly titles and read one text, this text
must bring connections to at least another one, or so I hope it could work like
this.
Now, when it’s named like this I have the usual
plans of seeing it more clear in my mind, and so I will be able to invest more
thoughts on it. It’d be nice to think now I could see possibilities I didn’t
before, even though a whole year has passed without much advance and I was
never able to make the networking function even as slightly as I expected.
